Car Accident
Car accidents are the most common personal injury claim in California. The at-fault driver is liable under negligence principles, and California's pure comparative fault system from Li v. Ye...
Car Accident guide →Slip and fall accidents — and all premises liability claims — are governed by California Civil Code Section 1714's general duty of reasonable care, and Rowland v. Christian (1968) 69 Cal.2d 108, which established that property owners owe a
This page provides general legal information about slip and fall claims in California. It does not provide legal advice. Consult a licensed California attorney for guidance specific to your situation.
Slip and fall accidents — and all premises liability claims — are governed by California Civil Code Section 1714's general duty of reasonable care, and Rowland v. Christian (1968) 69 Cal.2d 108, which established that property owners owe a duty of care to all persons on their property, including trespassers in some circumstances. The key liability question is whether the owner knew or should have known of the dangerous condition and failed to correct or warn of it.
California personal injury law provides a robust framework for slip and fall victims. The governing legal standard depends on the type of injury: vehicle accidents proceed under negligence (with Vehicle Code violations establishing negligence per se); premises liability proceeds under the Rowland v. Christian (1968) duty of care; product liability proceeds under Greenman v. Yuba Power Products (1963) strict liability; and medical malpractice proceeds under MICRA's professional negligence standard with its specific damage caps and shorter statute of limitations.
California's pure comparative fault system from Li v. Yellow Cab Co. (1975) allows slip and fall victims to recover damages even if they were partly at fault. Recovery is reduced proportionally by the victim's fault percentage but not eliminated. California imposes no cap on economic or non-economic damages in non-malpractice personal injury cases.
Liability in slip and fall cases depends on the specific facts and the legal theory governing the injury type. For vehicle accidents: the at-fault driver and their employer (if driving for work). For premises liability: the property owner, lessee, or other party who controlled the property. For product liability: the manufacturer, distributor, and retailer in the entire distribution chain. For medical malpractice: the licensed healthcare provider and potentially the healthcare facility. For workplace accidents: the employer's workers' compensation insurer (exclusive remedy against the employer) and third-party defendants whose negligence contributed.
"Within two years: An action for assault, battery, or injury to, or for the death of, an individual caused by the wrongful act or neglect of another."
California slip and fall victims can recover: all past and future medical expenses (no cap); lost wages and lost earning capacity; property damage; non-economic damages (pain, suffering, emotional distress, disfigurement, loss of enjoyment of life) — uncapped in non-malpractice personal injury cases; and punitive damages under Civil Code Section 3294 when the defendant's conduct constitutes malice, oppression, or fraud. Medical malpractice non-economic damages are capped by MICRA at $470,000 (personal injury) and $650,000 (wrongful death) in 2026.
Two years from the date of injury under CCP Section 335.1 for most slip and fall claims. Medical malpractice: one year from discovery or three years from the act (CCP Section 340.5). Government entity claims: six-month administrative claim under Government Code Section 945.4. Minor victims: tolled until age 18 under CCP Section 352. Missing any applicable deadline permanently bars the claim.
To establish premises liability, you must prove: (1) the defendant owned, leased, or controlled the property; (2) the defendant was negligent in the use or maintenance of the property; (3) you were harmed; and (4) the defendant's negligence was a substantial factor in causing the harm. The key element in most slip and fall cases is whether the owner knew or should have known of the dangerous condition.
Notice is the critical element: you must show the property owner had actual notice (they knew about the hazard) or constructive notice (the hazard existed long enough that they should have discovered it through reasonable inspection). Constructive notice cases often turn on surveillance footage showing how long the hazard existed before the fall.
Yes. California's pure comparative fault applies to premises liability claims. If the victim was not watching where they were walking, was distracted, or wore inappropriate footwear, the defendant will raise comparative fault to reduce the damages owed. Recovery is reduced proportionally by the victim's fault percentage but not eliminated.
Two years from the date of injury under CCP Section 335.1. Government property slip and fall cases (city sidewalks, public buildings, government facilities) require a written administrative claim within six months under Government Code Section 945.4. Missing the six-month government deadline permanently bars the claim against the public entity.
California Government Code Section 835 allows claims against public entities for dangerous conditions on public property. The Government Claims Act requires a written administrative claim within six months of the injury under Government Code Section 945.4. This deadline is jurisdictional — missing it permanently bars any lawsuit against the government entity.
All medical expenses, lost wages, lost earning capacity, and non-economic damages (pain, suffering, emotional distress, loss of enjoyment of life) — uncapped in California premises liability cases. Serious slip and fall injuries — hip fractures, head injuries, spinal injuries — can produce substantial economic and non-economic damage awards.
Car accidents are the most common personal injury claim in California. The at-fault driver is liable under negligence principles, and California's pure comparative fault system from Li v. Ye...
Car Accident guide →Commercial truck accidents involve a federal regulatory framework — FMCSA minimum insurance of $750,000 under 49 CFR Section 387.9, hours-of-service limits, ELD records, and multi-defendant ...
Truck Accident guide →California medical malpractice claims are governed by the Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act (MICRA), which caps non-economic damages at $470,000 for personal injury and $650,000 for wro...
Medical Malpractice guide →